http://reason.com/archives/2011/04/13/the-post-postal-society

Reason Magazine

reason.org

reason.com

reason.tv

donate

Subscribe

Print

E-Reader

Android
App

iPhone App

Reason E-Mail
Lists

Reason
Stuff

Subscriber
Services

Share

Reason on
Facebook

Reason on Twitter

Reason on Youtube

Reason
RSS

About

About

Contact

Privacy

Reason Foundation

Submission
Guidelines

Staff

Staff

Contributors

Archives

Archives

Print Issues

Cover Gallery

Hit & Run Blog

Brickbats

Topics

Poll

Feeds

Podcasts

RSS

Events

Advertise

Donate

The
Post-Postal Society?

The U.S. Postal Service struggles to stay self-sufficient.

Greg Beato from the May 2011 issue

In 2006 the nation's vast army of postal clerks, letter carriers, and
facer-canceler machines processed and distributed 213 billion pieces of mail. By
2010 that number had dropped to 170 billion, and according to forecasts
commissioned by the U.S. Postal Service (USPS), the total will sink to 150
billion by 2020. In March 2010, postal administrators announced that the USPS
could run up a cumulative deficit as high as $238 billion during the next
decade. To cut expenses in the face of eroding revenues, the postal service
floated the idea of reducing delivery to five days a week and stepped up its
efforts to shutter underperforming post offices and branches. This year, it
hopes to close as many as 2,000 of its approximately 32,000 outlets

When this sort of thing happens, the locals typically express…well, "outrage"
might be too strong a word for it, but they definitely get mildly annoyed. In
December 2010, for example, the USPS closed a post office located on the campus
of the University of Oregon in Eugene. "I don't even know where I would go if it
closes," a student told the campus newspaper. (There are seven other post
offices in Eugene, including one less than a mile away from the university.) "I
would never find another postal job as fun as this one," exclaimed a postal
employee faced with moving to a new location.

All across America, in the small towns politicians like to iconize as
citadels of self-sufficiency and can-do spirit, the lack of easy access to
Pottery Barn catalogs and utility bills is threatening to tear things asunder.
"This is how towns get broken," the author Bill McKibben wrote in a 2008 New
York Times article when the USPS temporarily shut down the post office in
his tiny hometown of Ripton, Vermont.

"We don't have much left in our small town…so it is nice to go up there and
run into people that you wouldn't see otherwise," a resident of Tallula,
Illinois, told the Associated Press in February 2011. "We have been hoping and
praying [the postal service] doesn't close it," a resident of Crescent City,
Illinois, lamented to USA Today the same month. "If we lose
our post office, we're just about lost."

Closing a small-town post office, or even a couple thousand small-town post
offices, isn't going to put much of a dent into the $8.5 billion deficit the
USPS recorded in 2010 or the $3.8 billion deficit it racked up the previous
year. The postal service's most pressing fiscal crisis arises from a provision
in the 2006 Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act that requires it to
prefund its Retiree Health Benefits Fund at the rate of approximately $5.6
billion a year from 2007 to 2016; the agency has not been able to make those
payments without running up huge deficits.

But if thousands of underperforming post offices are a relatively tiny
albatross around the postal service's neck, they will no doubt continue to serve
as a point of controversy as the agency tries to retool itself for a reduced
role in the Internet age.

Forty years ago, on July 1, 1971, the Post Office Department evolved into the
United States Postal Service, a federal but independently operating entity that
sustains itself with no direct support from taxpayers. (To cover years in which
it operates at a deficit, it has a $15 billion credit line with the U.S.
Treasury.) If the USPS wants to maintain its self-sustaining status in the face
of declining demand for its most lucrative monopoly, first-class mail, it must
shed personnel, streamline infrastructure, and cut services.

Every time the postal service resorts to such measures, it jeopardizes—or at
least appears to jeopardize—its commitment to making the postal system as
accessible, comprehensive, and democratic as possible. But if the USPS has a
longtime mandate to serve the public interest, it also has a longtime mandate to
make its own ends meet. Neither George Washington nor James Madison imagined
that the government's general treasury would underwrite America's emerging mail
system, the Columbia historian Richard R. John argues in "History of Universal
Service and the Postal Monopoly," a 2008 paper commissioned by Congress.
"Indeed, it was far more likely that they presumed, with Treasury Secretary
Alexander Hamilton, that the postal system might one day transfer a substantial
surplus to the government as the British postal system had in Great Britain, and
as the American postal system would for several decades after 1787."

The postal service's mandate of self-sustainability is often scorned by
advocates who believe the government is failing any citizen who has to travel
more than a mile to ship a batch of cookies to grandma at Christmas. But
self-sustainability and serving the public can also be viewed as interdependent
motives. If you aren't meeting the public's needs and expectations in some
substantial way, you won't be self-sustaining for long. If you aren't
self-sustaining, your ability to serve the public interest becomes contingent on
the whims of politicians.

In the case of the postal service, it seems pretty clear that the
infrastructure it developed to serve 19th-century America isn't quite as
necessary in the 21st. In 1901 there were 76,945 post offices in the United
States. Today there are 32,000, and if the postal service had free rein to purge
as many as it saw fit, who knows how many would remain? But how many people
would argue that it's harder for us to communicate with friends and family or to
pursue long-distance business interests than it was for our forebears in 1901?
Who would claim that we have less access to information than they did? The idea
that the postal service's efforts to streamline its operations in pursuit of
ongoing viability might somehow leave even small numbers of Americans in an
information void is preposterous. We are the most tightly connected civilization
in the history of humanity, and even an organization capable of deploying
inefficiency on the scale achieved by the USPS can't change that.

Even postal preservationists end up undermining the utilitarian importance of
post offices. In his 2006 book Preserving the People's Post Office,
Christopher W. Shaw, a project director at Ralph Nader's Center for Study of
Responsive Law, says the USPS serves as a symbol of "our nation's democratic
aspirations by serving everyone equally" and provides a vital "community hub"
where neighbors can bump into each other and trade small talk for a few minutes.
In a similar vein, "A Framework for Considering the Social Value of Postal
Services," a 2010 white paper prepared by the Urban Institute on behalf of the
Postal Regulatory Commission, winds up arguing that post offices benefit
communities in ways that have nothing to do with collecting or distributing
mail. "Post offices bring increased foot traffic for nearby businesses," it
reports in one section. "Some post offices are drop-off points for recycling
cell phones and other goods," it advises in another.

So post offices are homey but high-minded emblems of
democracy, bustling third spaces for towns too bucolically correct to tolerate a
Starbucks (which are still outnumbered by post offices by a more than two-to-one
margin). In the same way that Filson hunting jackets and chambray utility shirts
have been recast as urban fashion, the post office is turning into a lifestyle
prop, an authentic, old-timey example of "heritage" communications. And, of
course, the most democratic place in the land to recycle your old cell phone
when you upgrade to a Nokia E5 and its superior messaging
capabilities.

Contributing Editor Greg
Beato ([email-masked]) writes from San Francisco.

Reason needs your support. Please donate today!

Tweet

more sharing

StumbleUpon

Digg

Reddit

Try
Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are
not completely satisfied.

Reason RUPE: Public Opinion Survey

New Gallup Survey: A
Majority of Americans Favor Legalizing Marijuana Use (10.18)

In Their Words: What Is
the Biggest Problem Facing Americans Today? (10.3)

Young Americans Age 18-29
Are Less Critical of Government, More Open to Entitlement Reform, and More
Socially Liberal (9.30)

Mitt Romney and Ron Paul
Tie Among 18-29 Year-Old Republicans (9.28)

Government Spending In
Your Own Words (9.28)

advertisements

Get Reason E-mail Updates!

First Name
Last Name Email Manage your Reason e-mail list
subscriptions

Site comments/questions:

Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:

(310) 367-6109

Editorial & Production Offices:

3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310)
391-2245

Home|About|Advertise|Privacy|Contact
Copyright 2011, Reason
Magazine